Creating Waves of Awareness
Mental Symptoms In An Acute Disorder
For how much extent should we rely on mental symptoms in an acute distress?
An example of why I am asking the above question is that today I encountered a tonsillitis case. The person's disposition is basically shy and reserved, not interacting that much with the others.
I gave Sil 200C in 1 dose, but the problem aggravated. After that I gave Bell 200 in 1 dose (I gave bell basing on the assumption that Bell is a first to consider remedy in a case of tonsillitis.Then he cured after giving Bell - 1 dose.
I am in a big confusion about how much extent we should rely on mentals in this kind of cases?
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Hans Weitbrecht on -
Thanks for getting interested in my research. I have Herings article on the directions of cure 1856, and all his further references. I can say, that if such directions in the progress of a case are observed, they may be taken as an indication that the case progresses towards cure. On the reverse, the absence of such observation does not mean, that cure does not happen. hering did not call his rules laws.
Ask further questions, or if you ever are around, drop in and make use of my extensive library.
I have studdied Dr. Segals aproach, which he bases on ortegas views and kents elaborations long before you even could spell the word homeopathy.
It is u to yourself to become a homeopath, to become familiar with the rules and principles, as laid down by hahnemann. These rules and principles have in the past defined homeoapty and will continue to do so in the future.
I will vigurously keep the principles and rules up, but have no problem if you or anyone else feel, that they have advanced from the basic rules and principles. Go ahead and do as you feel like. ONLY! don't call it HOMEOPATHY if it contravenes the rules and principles!!
Call it Mittu therapy, write a book on it, and see how it works for you.
In essence, I don't beleif that medical experiments are ethically viable when performed on the sick and suffering. This keeps me away from a hit-and-miss or try-this-that- therapy. This is the VERY reason why I became a homeopath,-- to get away from such doing.
-
Permalink Reply by Dr. Meakin Mittu M.D.(Hom.) on -
Quote :
Thanks for getting interested in my research. I have Herings article on the directions of cure 1856, and all his further references. I can say, that if such directions in the progress of a case are observed, they may be taken as an indication that the case progresses towards cure. On the reverse, the absence of such observation does not mean, that cure does not happen. hering did not call his rules laws.
Ask further questions, or if you ever are around, drop in and make use of my extensive library.
Reply :
This field is full of research and everyone is doing { Dr scholtan, dr sankaran, dr vijaykar, dr sehgal, ortega etc etc ] , You are not different.You are proud of yours research and degrading others research. What a pity ?
As you have mentioned absence of hering's rule doesn't mean cure is not in progress
similarly if one is not referring MMP , doesn't means he is not curing the sick or is not able to do so..
Even a simple pat on back can bring a patient back to his normal health, it is not the homoeopathy alone. Simple one needs to know the reason behind the illness, not only knowing the book behind a cure.
Quote
"I have studdied Dr. Segals aproach, which he bases on ortegas views and kents elaborations long before you even could spell the word homeopathy."
Reply
Did you ever do something else than criticising, Dr sehgal has ignited the torch of kent which was simmering low and he did it when you were able to spell homoeopathy and write it in proper spellings.Why you didn't do something like that though you were capable enough [ as you said so with your so called vast research and extensive library ]
Quote
"It is u to yourself to become a homeopath, to become familiar with the rules and principles, as laid down by hahnemann. These rules and principles have in the past defined homeoapty and will continue to do so in the future.
I will vigurously keep the principles and rules up, but have no problem if you or anyone else feel, that they have advanced from the basic rules and principles. Go ahead and do as you feel like. ONLY! don't call it HOMEOPATHY if it contravenes the rules and principles!!
Call it Mittu therapy, write a book on it, and see how it works for you."
Reply:-
Every single homoeopath is well versed with principles of homoeopathy , they don'y need to remind it.
No one has denied the worth of principles which are founded by Master after much ADVANCING his approach in the subject, giving multiple editions, lesser writtings, chronic diseases etc etc . If he didn't follow his conscious and conscience he must have stick to the law of similars and all other laws would not have been promulgated.Single remedy, multiple remedies, alternating two remedies, Mother tincture application or administration, genus epidemicus all were his ways, not ours. On the similar leaval if modern master are suggesting their views, What is the harm of listening and appreciating their efforts and experience. Get it or reject it bt do not give disrespect to them with self-admiration showing yourself the only flag-bearer of homoeopathy. There is always a scope of improvement and amendment in every single theory or existence.
I am not yet capable enough to give MITTU THERAPY, but if i can i will be thankful to you as you name it first."
Quote
"In essence, I don't beleif that medical experiments are ethically viable when performed on the sick and suffering. "
Reply
So you want a healthy to underwent an experiment. Is it ethical and legal ? I need your opinion, i don't have mine . So if you can put some light on it.
Quote
"This keeps me away from a hit-and-miss or try-this-that- therapy.
Reply:
So you mean to say you have 100% result in your clinical practice and you never miss a single patient without a cure. Isn't it. As you never do hit nd miss method and always used the right method So must be GOD then or else. Please Clarify this too.
Quote
"This is the VERY reason why I became a homeopath,-- to get away from such doing.
Reply
I am not interested in knowing the reason about why you become a homoeopath, But really it must be tragic or something.
-
Permalink Reply by Hans Weitbrecht on
-
Der Sir
You may consult homeopathic MMP for selecting remedy.
Compare Hahneman MMP: vol.:1 third ed. 1830: symptoms: 1390, 1391, 1392, 1387, 1388.
Here you find confirmation of the patients mood.
Using and studying MMP will help you to correct your understanding of BELLADONNA.
Best of success with your endeavors.
-
Permalink Reply by Dr Muhammed Rafeeque on -
Dear dr, When I was in 1st year BHMS, one teacher had suggested us to read MMP. All students started reading the same, but no one was interested to continue since we found the symptoms difficult to remember for exam point of view. This could be the reason why people prefer other materia medica books that include the words of provers and physicians.
-
Permalink Reply by Hans Weitbrecht on
-
Dear Dr.
Yes, this can be problem, because your teacher did not tell you how to study MMP. He probably did not know either.
But -- and I told you twice before -- there is a way to study MMP, which creates such knowledege neccessary for proper prescribing without vading through thousands of symptoms again and again, every time we have a difficult selection to make.
This method is presented in the: HOMEOPATHY STUDY GUIDE.
You are wellcome to study MMP, like any other member.
And if homeopaths would have studied MMP accordingly before treating, then this discussion would not be neccessary at all.
-
Permalink Reply by Dr Muhammed Rafeeque on
-
Dear dr, Thanks for the suggestion. Just having a paint and brush is not enough, we should know how to use it. I will surely go through Study Guide and open MMP kept inside my cupboard. Thanks for the inspiration. I hope other friends will do the same.
-
Permalink Reply by Hans Weitbrecht on
-
Please encourage them!
-
Permalink Reply by sajjadakram on -
In every acute case the present signs and symptoms (Physicals) are the best guide for the selection of the curative remedy. You can also take help of mental symptoms as concomitants provided they are prominent.
sajjad.
-
Permalink Reply by Hans Weitbrecht on
-
The state of the mind (=mood), -- which is NOT equal the mental symptoms --, if altered from the previous normal state ALWAYS forms part of the disease-symptom-picture. Mental symptoms, if unaltered do not form part of the disease-symptom-picture and therefore do NOT form the basis for the now needed remedy.
Mental Symptoms do not have automatically Par.: 153 status. Change in MOOD has.
-
Permalink Reply by lonneke schuller tot peursum on
-
I don't think the quarreling between Hans and Mittu is helping Srinivasa Kumar with his problems....
-
Permalink Reply by Hans Weitbrecht on
-
That comment won't help him at all.
What I felt helpful to say about the issue is already contained in my earlier postings, -- so nothing to add.
Enjoy yourselves, cheers goodby,--
-
Permalink Reply by Dr. Meakin Mittu M.D.(Hom.) on
-
Exactly, simply by criticising this and that, tell others what you can suggest without condemning , let others feel enlightened with your knowledge rather feeling embarrassed that they did so much wrong by asking a help. teacher is he who motivates by his actions, words , deeds and sometimes by silence too, not someone who demotivates with the same .
- ‹ Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
© 2013 Created by Debby Bruck.
