my dear namrata.
after 1st prescription we find one of the following result given below:especially if medicine is given in dynamic potency
1. curative effect: recovery of the patient without any aggravation.
2. partial amelioration on both mental and physical level but there after we find disease aggravation in both condition either after single dose or in repeated dose. the medicine having partial similarity gives such type of result. principle is principle. treat at least 10 cases in repeated dose and see the result.please never make an opinion on a single case.if over dose have any meaning you will get aggravation in every case. but it is not so.
3.No effect on the patient
4. proving of the medicine on the patient.
note: how can you say there was much improvement and what do you mean by aggravation in all chief complaints. observation after 1st prescription is a matter of experience.
by words "much improvement" i meant that patient felt marked mental as well as physical relief... the patient's chief complaints were eruptions with watery discharge which was aggravated to the great extent....
the patient was on another constitutional medicine...but in between he was given anti miasmatic remedy which had first done amelioration and then aggravation..
by the way, thanks a lot for your views sir... the drug might acted partially upon patient..
hi dr namrata
you are opening with the case very slowly.i think there are so meny things to explain in this case.
if you do not mind i want to understand this case through its complaints, medicine fiven and the improvement. let me know the mental symptoms before and after treatment, the physical symptoms before and after treatment,was the case a miasmatic one having miasmatic symptoms, have you treated the patient who has complaints or the apparent disease, have you seen the result of the medicine on the patient or on the particular part.
note: do you know the different between miasmatic and non-miasmatic treatment, miasmatic and non-miasmatic remedy.