What To Do When Aggravation Comes After Anti-Miasmatic Treatment?

Hello friends.

What can we do when aggravation comes after repeated dose of anti-miasmatic remedy? The patient had reported marked relief from first few doses.

Tags: case-management, community, homeopathy, miasms, world

1 member likes this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by dr e a farooquee on September 6, 2010 at 4:27pm

my dear namrata.
after 1st prescription we find one of the following result given below:especially if medicine is given in dynamic potency
1. curative effect: recovery of the patient without any aggravation.
2. partial amelioration on both mental and physical level but there after we find disease aggravation in both condition either after single dose or in repeated dose. the medicine having partial similarity gives such type of result. principle is principle. treat at least 10 cases in repeated dose and see the result.please never make an opinion on a single case.if over dose have any meaning you will get aggravation in every case. but it is not so.
3.No effect on the patient
4. proving of the medicine on the patient.
note: how can you say there was much improvement and what do you mean by aggravation in all chief complaints. observation after 1st prescription is a matter of experience.

with regards
dr e a farooquee

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dr. Namrata Bosamia on September 7, 2010 at 10:50am

hello sir...

by words "much improvement" i meant that patient felt marked mental as well as physical relief... the patient's chief complaints were eruptions with watery discharge which was aggravated to the great extent....

the patient was on another constitutional medicine...but in between he was given anti miasmatic remedy which had first done amelioration and then aggravation..

by the way, thanks a lot for your views sir... the drug might acted partially upon patient..

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by dr e a farooquee on September 7, 2010 at 3:32pm

hi dr namrata
you are opening with the case very slowly.i think there are so meny things to explain in this case.
if you do not mind i want to understand this case through its complaints, medicine fiven and the improvement. let me know the mental symptoms before and after treatment, the physical symptoms before and after treatment,was the case a miasmatic one having miasmatic symptoms, have you treated the patient who has complaints or the apparent disease, have you seen the result of the medicine on the patient or on the particular part.
note: do you know the different between miasmatic and non-miasmatic treatment, miasmatic and non-miasmatic remedy.

regards
dr e a farooquee

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dr Ravindra Saraswat on September 6, 2010 at 3:14pm

Dr. Namrata, In this case stop the repetition and wait and watch for some time. If there is no releif then give low potency of antimiasmatic remedy.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Hans Weitbrecht on September 6, 2010 at 5:21pm

Dear Sir

Answer: We evaluate and consider.

We can evaluate once we have all relevant information, such as case records and remedies applied. We can consider several options, -- all of them outlined in the organon.

If we don't have sufficient information we can guess -- a thing I'd rather leave to others.

Sincerely,
Hans Weitbrecht
HOMEOPATH

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by kuram srinivasachar anand on December 24, 2010 at 9:09pm

Well! Dr. Namrata. What happened with the case? The treatment, the problem faced, and the opinions given have given partial education . Please complement it with the final action and results.