Homeopaths are of the firm opinion that homeopathy is a therapeutic
process, with a basic law " Likes cure Likes, and it is quite effective
and more than 200 hundred years of it's practice around the Globe is a
testimony enough to prove it's credential beyond doubts. This is beside,
the people,who are of the opinion that Homeopathic medicines are
nothing but placebo.
Lot of research work is on, for proving
of homeopathy, clinical and biological experiments, theoretical
discussions on the scientific validity of homeopathy, requirement of
research in homeopathy and scientific protocols etc,But still with many
theories put forward, including one by Noble price winner, the
scientific world is in denial mode.
In this complex situation,
suddenly we stat finding more claims coming from Homeopaths, practicing
Drug energy transmission through hair.Selection of medicine by pendulum
and some more methods, which are not with in the scope of homeopathic
laws, originally.Practitioners of such methods are also claiming
brilliant results.Many of us are severely critical of such methods, and I
am one among those who instantly object to such methods even to be
labeled as homeopathy.Am I prejudiced ?
Should researchers include, these also as research topics for in-depth study and analysis of these methods!