The Real Deal
What I see is needed is not to bring in all this newfangled stuff to make a name for ourselves but to work at what we have and bring that to a more scientific footing.
That requires 3 things:
1. Get rid of the alphabetical arrangement of MM and arrange the remedies by similarity, as matching the disease syndromes.
2. Get rid of the silly head to foot schema and organise MM according to the timeline and sequence of development of symptoms, to reflect those disease syndromes.
3. Rearrange the repertory, to reflect the MM according to that timeline and sequence.
Once we have accomplished that, we have a true scientific footing for homoeopathy and the law of similars cannot be denied nor refuted. My motto is KISS. Keep It Simple Stupid!
All this techno babble is an attempt to imitate the complicated allopathic ideas, while signifying nothing but the adage that complication is a sign of ignorance.
My tongue is sharp and my pen is mightier than the sword. I speak truth to power and shall not cower down in supplication to the ruling paradigm or the attempts to water down homoeopathy with allopathic ideas and thinking.
Truth is self-evident and all attempts at destroying will not succeed for as long as I have breath in me. While I admire the ideas that some may bring forward, I see them mostly as attempts at system building.
Homoeopathy reflects Nature and should remain natural and be brought closer to that ideal. I have given some examples of what we need to do, to make it "scientific", which word today is but an oxymoron.
We are beginning to feel the attempt to rob us of our power. To say it is the loss implicates it is already too late and we are fighting a rearguard battle. I am the one here who is the militant and I go in full frontal attack on anyone seeking to disparage my beloved homoeopathy. OEN is one website where we have won the two battles they wanted to wage with us.
The only way to win is to rally the troops - your client base. They are running in the 100 million in europe and 3.5 billion worldwide. there are 3 million CAM practitioners in the world, as opposed to 1 million doctors. All we need to do, is jointly confront them. To me, TCM and Ayurveda are our allies, but the combo prescriber is the enemy, because he has succumbed to allopathic thinking and caters to the allopaths in the hope of greater recognition.
We don't need their recognition. We need to be their replacement.
To use their terminology, their types of tests, their use of language, is to admit we have to succumb to them. We need not to convince them, but the public. We need to make the public aware they can vote out, the politicians that cater to Big Pharma and vote in, those that cater to the people.
Again, we need to organise MM so that it reflects the reality of the disease syndrome and it can no longer be denied. Instead, colleagues insist we should use materials science, chemistry, bio-chemistry and nano-technology to show the denialists that we are right. I say, no matter how much you show them, they will still deny it.
If you are a grocer, the supermarket is the enemy and the only way you stay in business is to convince the consumer that your products are better, your price lower and your service supreme. You will never convince the supermarket of that, however much you try. We are not dependent on the supermarket, but on the consumers.